Input–output models are general equilibrium
models defined for national or regional economies. They are based on a tableaux
of transactions by groups of industries that are referred to as sectors.
Pioneered by Wassily Leontief, they build on systems of national accounts
that track gross product and gross income and also include measures of
intermediate transactions. These models decompose all industrial production in
whatever region is being modeled into groupings of industries (sectors) that
have distinctive production structures.
Wassily Leontief’s brilliant insight in
developing these models was to recognize that economies classified according to
these production structures could then be generalized so that the final
production measures in national or regional accounts could be mathematically
related to measures
of industrial output in particular sectors. Input–output
models typically are built around a matrix of transactions.
The sales (or output) of any given sector are
distributed as sales to other sectors (intermediate sales) and sales to
categories of final demand (consumption, investment, government, and exports to
other regions). In any sector, the distribution of sales is paralleled by
accounts that describe where a sector purchases the inputs needed to produce its
output. These are divided among purchases from other sectors, purchases from
sources of value added, and imports from other regions. The grouping of industries
into sectors is based on an analysis of the structure of input (purchase)
requirements such that each sector has a distinctive input structure.
The transactions matrix in an input–output
model is generalized into a system of input coefficients, defined by dividing
the purchases in a sector into proportions of total purchases. Through
appropriate matrix arithmetic manipulations, these input coefficients can be
modified to represent sector-to-sector specific “multipliers.” The multiplier
concept is at the heart of input–output models. These multipliers relate levels
of sales (output) to levels of final demand in specific pairs of sectors.
Input–output models frequently are specified
so that the multiplier measures are expressed in multiple ways such as measures
of industrial output, employment, and labor income. Input–output models can be
estimated by surveys of national or regional economies. However, they
frequently are estimated for regions through nonsurvey approaches and have
various degrees of “closure.” In regional applications, it is common to include
in the multiplier structure of these models components of the income and final
demand accounts that are strongly tied to levels of local production such as personal
consumption expenditures and labor income.
Input–output models are conceptually similar
to several other widely used models of multipliers, including simple economic
base models and regional econometric models. Simple economic base models do not
distinguish the magnitude of multipliers of individual sectors; instead, they
simply describe total output or employment as a function of export activity. Regional
econometric models develop more complex multiplier relations than those found
in regional input–output models. They extend the mathematics of these models to
deal with temporal patterns in multipliers and provide more sophisticated
measures of impact than those provided by input–output models. —William Beyers
No comments:
Post a Comment